Mary Flannery O’Connor Essay Sample free essay sample

Mary Flannery O’Connor is a maestro narrator employs the usage of several literary devices to research multiple subjects. character development and secret plan advancement. A arresting illustration of her accomplishments as an writer can be found in her short narrative â€Å"A Good Man is Difficult to Find† . Through the usage of assorted signifiers of sarcasm. O’Connor explores the subject of perceptual experience. O’Connor asserts that the perceptual experience of events differs from single to single and is about ever biased and distorted by that individual’s belief system. She continues that persons find comfort in this close eyesight even though the terminal consequence may be unsafe and even lifelessly. The secret plan in â€Å"A Good Man is Difficult to Find† is that force must be present for a individual to turn his / her life around and happen God. . The concerns of this narrative are the basic concerns of Christian belief: religion. We will write a custom essay sample on Mary Flannery O’Connor Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page decease. redemption. And yet. if one reads the narrative without bias. there would look to be little here to animate hope for salvation of any of its characters. It is the usage of characters that O’Connor asserts her believe that merely through force can individual alteration and happen redemption. In her attempts to strike a soft topographic point in the bosom of the Misfit. the Grandmother leads their conversation into spiritual channels. That is. she admonishes him to â€Å"pray. † possibly trusting to deflect him from the scaring narration of his violent life: â€Å"If you would pray. . . Jesus would assist you† . Mentioning the name of Jesus is a error. for it ignites a slow-burning fuse in the head of the Misfit. It seems that he has given Jesus a good trade of thought–far more than the Grandmother of all time had done. Indeed. as she continues to mumble the name of Jesus. â€Å"the manner she was stating it. it sounded as if she might be cursing† . With cold strength. neer raising his voice. the Misfit intones. â€Å"Jesus thown everything off balance. It was the same instance with Him as with me except He hadn’t committed any offense. . . † . Ignoring the Grandmother’s bawling. the Misfit pursues his compulsion: â€Å"Je sus was the lone One that of all time raised the dead. . . and He shouldn’t have done it. He thown everything off balance† . For the Misfit. as for many others ( including Jesus himself on the cross ) . the job is one of religion. He can non believe. because he has no cogent evidence. Therefore. the pick is clear: â€Å"If He did what He said. so it’s nil for you to make but throw away everything and follow Him. and if He didn’t. so it’s nil for you to make but bask the few proceedingss you got left the best manner you can-by killing person or firing down his house or making some other beastliness to him. No pleasance but beastliness. † he said and his voice had become about a snarl. The emptiness in the psyche of the Misfit is non an absence of spiritual religion ( as the Grandmother naively sees it ) . but his deficiency of any sort of religion at all. The Misfit trusts nil that he has non himself witnessed. touched. weighed and measured. This is his â€Å"reality. † Whatever transcends that reality–faith. hope. and charity might sum it up really well–has no significance for him. He will non swear the miracles of Jesus because. as he agitatedly complains to the Grandmother. â€Å"It ain’t right I wasn’t at that place because it I had of been there I would of known† . The Misfit’s inability to believe has destroyed his humanity. His indifference is complete: â€Å"No pleasance but beastliness. † The Grandmother read the organic structure but does non genuinely understand it. She is speedy to raise the name of Jesus. but it is absolutely clear that the Grandmother’s faith is wholly of the lip-serving assortment. â€Å"Maybe He didn’t raise the dead. † she murmurs in response to the Misfit’s outburst. for it barely makes any difference to her. one manner or the other. She is concerned merely with her endurance. in the thick of the blood-bath that has engulfed her household. The fact that Bailey. his married woman. and their kids now lie dead nearby seems to hold every bit small significance for her as the deity of Jesus–a subject. nevertheless. of obliging importance to the Misfit. Unlike the Grandmother. the Misfit has struggled to understand good and evil. His concluding finding of fact is unrelentingly logical. And yet. surprisingly. their philosophical positions–his by finding. hers by accident–are non so far apart in the terminal. By his visible radiations. she could hold been â€Å"a good woman†Ã¢â‚¬â€œif merely she had non talked so much. Traveling by two different paths. the Grandmother and the Misfit have arrived at the same finish. both geographically and intellectually. No words could be more shocking. and yet appropriate: â€Å"Why you’re one of my babes. You’re one of my ain kids! † Indeed he is one of her babes ; for her deficiency of values is his deficiency every bit good. Those two faces. so close together. are mirror images. The Misfit is merely a more wholly evolved signifier of the Grandmother. In truth. one of her babes. O’Connor uses force throughout her short narrative â€Å"A Good Man is Difficult to Find† a s way to transmutation. The force that the Misfits creates and the force that the Grandmother sick persons lead to each character understanding their ain redemption. It is merely through this force that these characters have been the mistake of their ways and have found the visible radiation. O’Connor seems to take a firm stand at this minute of common disclosure that the Grandmother is transformed into the agent of God’s grace is to make serious force to the narrative. It is every bit tendencious as to decree that the three slugs in her thorax typify the Three. At the terminal. â€Å"A Good Man is Difficult to Find† descends further into the deepnesss of desperation. O’Connor understands that universe can be a chilling topographic point and immorality does be in our day-to-day enterprises. To believe that any one individual is better so yourself is po ssibly the worst immorality as all. Her narrative is full of darkness and leaves small room for hope. Yet. possibly that was O’Connor’s concluding sarcasm – that while the universe may hold immorality there is besides light.